
Peredvizhniki (Itinerants or Wanderers). | Peredvizhniki (Itinerants or Wanderers). From the mid-eighteenth century, the Russian school of painting and sculpture had been controlled by the Imperial Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg. In the relatively liberal atmosphere of Alexander II's "Great Reforms," there was growing discontent among some artists with the traditionally conservative attitude of the Academy of Arts. In 1863, a group of students at the Academy rebelled at the proposed topic for the annual Gold Medal painting competition: "The Entrance of Odin into Valhalla." They felt that this mythological fantasy was too remote from the real life of Russia that, they believed, demanded their artistic attention. Thirteen painters and one sculptor resigned from the Academy. Soon after they withdrew from the Academy, these "Thirteen Contestants" formed an Artists' Cooperative Society. In 1870, they formed the "Society for Traveling Art Exhibitions," and the painters became known as "Peredvizhniki" (in English, they are known as "Wanderers" or "Travelers" or "Itinerants." The Peredvizhniki committed themselves to populist themes painted in an accessible realist style and believed their art might serve as a vehicle for social reform and promote the development of a national consciousness. Although the leaders of the Peredvizhniki were conscious of European movements, their own agenda was a Russian one. Among their constant themes were the Russian peasantry, the Russian landscape, and the Russian clergy. But the Peredvizhniki were progressive not only in the subjects they chose to paint, but also in the way they reached their audience. Earlier, significant art exhibitions had been limited to Moscow and St. Petersburg, but now the artists who allied themselves with this traveling group had the opportunity to reach a much wider audience than they would have earlier. The creation of an art tradition depends, of course, not only on how art is created, but how it is preserved, displayed, and received by current and future generations. In this regard an important role was played by the wealthy Moscow merchant and collector Pavel Tretiakov (1832-98). In 1892, Tretiakov, along with his brother, gave to the city of Moscow a collection of important paintings by some of the most significant Russian artists of the nineteenth century. Many of the canvasses came from the Peredvizhniki. This collection is still at the core of the Tretiakov gallery today. |
In this painting Perov strikes directly at the corruption of the rural clergy. The painting shows a group of priests staggering out of a village tavern in various states of inebriation. Even under the relatively liberal regime of Alexander II, this scene was considered too offensive and was withdrawn from exhibition. | |
"The Temptation of Christ" (1872-74) Ivan Kramskoi (1837-87) was one of the founders of the Society for Traveling Art Exhibitions. He believed that a portrait should characterize a person by demonstrating his or her moral convictions. In the "Temptation of Christ" or "Christ in the Wilderness", Kramskoi wanted to portray not the outward man, but the inner struggle between good and evil. He presents a nervous, exhausted man rather than Jesus as the Son of God. | |
| |
"Peter the Great Interrogating the Tsarevich Alexey" (1871) | |
"What is Truth (Christ and Pilate)" (1890) Like Perov's "Easter Procession," Ge's "What is Truth (Christ and Pilate)" was removed from exhibition under pressure from the Church. Although Ge was inspired by genuine religious feeling, his mute, haggard Jesus offended some. | |
"The Morning of the Execution of the Streltsy" (1881) | |
"Boyarina Morozova" (1887) | |
"Bargemen (The Volga Boatmen)" (1870-73) The eleven figures in the group have been called metaphors for Russia itself. The lead "hauler" was modeled after a defrocked priest whom Repin came to know during his stay on the Volga. He represents wisdom. Other figures represent different ages, nationalities and social sectors. In the middle of the dark and beaten-down figures of the haulers, a young man has lifted his head and is staring off out of the picture. To the young students who saw this picture, the meaning was clear: the boy was raising his head in an act of defiance and looking to them to come and lead the suffering people to deliverance. | |
"Religious Procession in Kursk" (1880-83) | |
"Tsar Ivan IV with the Body of his Son Ivan on November 16, 1581" (1881-85) | |
"They Did Not Expect Him" (1883-98) Ilya Repin In the later 1880s, Repin's favored subjects were heroism and populism. He was particularly drawn to themes involving dramatic and often tragic circumstances. One of the most superb examples of this genre is "They Did Not Expect Him." The composition, depicting the unexpected return from exile of a revolutionary populist, presents a startling, almost cinematic moment. The older boy recognizes his father almost immediately, while the younger sister, too young to remember him, looks frightened. As Hamilton writes, "The picture must be regarded as the finest artistic achievement of the social point of view of the Peredvizhniki. With it Repin can be said to have crowned and closed the history of ideological realism in Russian painting" (385). | |
Key Terms From Lectures | |
| |
Related Web Sites | |
![]() |
|
![]() | Новости дня |
![]() Читать целиком | "Заклятые друзья" объединили военные усилияВеликобритания и Франция заключили историческое соглашение по военному сотрудничеству, наблюдатели его уже даже назвали беспрецедентным. Документ подписали французский президент Николя Саркози и британский премьер Дэвид Кэмерон. |
Великобритания и Франция 2 ноября заключили историческое соглашение по военному сотрудничеству, наблюдатели его уже даже назвали беспрецедентным.
Документ подписали французский президент Николя Саркози и британский премьер Дэвид Кэмерон. Договор предполагает создать совместные силы быстрого реагирования из пяти тысяч военнослужащих. Кроме того, Англия и Франция будут совместно работать над самыми дорогими составляющими военных программ. При этом, обе стороны заявляют, что договоренности отнюдь не влекут за собой потерю независимости в военной сфере, а ещё - не исключают проведения самостоятельных операций.
"Я хочу развеять некоторые мифы. Новые договоренности не ослабят и не размоют, как некоторые предположили, суверенитет Британии или Франции. Речь не идёт о создании Европейской армии. И о том, чтобы иметь общее ядерное оружие - тоже не идёт. Британия и Франция остаются суверенными странами, которые могут использовать свои вооруженные силы независимо друг от друга в своих национальных интересах", - заявил премьер-министр Великобритании Дэвид Кэмерон.
Страны будут совместно пользоваться исследовательскими центрами в области ядерных вооружений, причём один из них во Франции построят на паях - 50 на 50. Авианосцы должны стать полностью совместимыми, что позволит самолётам приземляться на кораблях страны-партнера.
В воздухе оба государства будут использовать танкеры-дозаправщики Airbus, которые закупает Великобритания, а также транспортные самолеты А400М. Спектр совместных разработок будет включать атомные подводные лодки, ракеты, беспилотные летательные аппараты и спутники связи. Всё это делается не в последнюю очередь ради экономии. 2 недели назад правительство Кэмерона объявило, что сокращает военные расходы на 8 процентов.